Trust & accountability
Corrections.
This project is built to be challenged. If a source, claim, relationship or evidence label is wrong or incomplete, the goal is to correct it—not defend an outdated conclusion.
Correction policy
When stronger evidence materially changes a published claim, the site should change with it. That can mean narrowing a statement, changing an evidence label, removing a relationship, adding contradictory evidence or acknowledging that a question remains unresolved.
Uncertainty is not treated as a failure. If the evidence does not support a confident answer, the correct public answer is that we do not know.
Please identify the page, claim or relationship you are challenging and, when possible, provide the underlying document or source that supports the correction.
How claims are reviewed
Published relationships are checked for valid named endpoints, a specific relationship description, evidence status and a source. Higher-risk claims—especially allegations involving criminality, hidden coordination, intent, financial benefit or control—require a substantially higher evidence threshold.
A structural database check is not the same thing as rereading every source. Source-by-source verification is ongoing, with current and higher-risk claims receiving priority.