Case file 02 · Policy + personnel

Project 2025

The project’s own documents describe four interconnected pillars: a policy agenda, a personnel database, an administration training academy and an implementation playbook.

Evidence status: documented coreLast reviewed: November 2, 2026Heritage primary records

What the project said it was building

Heritage announced the 2025 Presidential Transition Project in April 2022 as an effort to prepare the next conservative administration with both policy recommendations and vetted, trained personnel. The published Mandate for Leadership described the goal as beginning transition work well before Election Day so a conservative administration could govern immediately.

Heritage later launched a Presidential Personnel Database to collect and vet prospective appointees and a Presidential Administration Academy to train them on the mechanics of government. Heritage described the coalition as involving dozens of partner organizations and explicitly framed personnel as a central implementation tool.

Interpretation: Project 2025 is unusually useful to this research because the policy-to-personnel-to-implementation mechanism is not inferred from proximity. The project itself described those pillars and their intended relationship.
ClaimStatusSource
Heritage launched the transition project in 2022 to combine policy and trained personnel.DocumentedHeritage launch announcement ↗
The project described four pillars: policy, personnel, training and a 180-day playbook.DocumentedHeritage — coalition/pillars ↗
A personnel database was created to collect and vet prospective appointees.DocumentedHeritage — personnel database ↗
The Administration Academy trained prospective appointees for “Day One” implementation.DocumentedHeritage — academy launch ↗
The published Mandate discussed PPO as a link between conservative organizations and the executive branch.DocumentedMandate for Leadership ↗

What still requires separate proof

A blueprint does not prove that every recommendation was adopted, that every coalition partner shaped every policy, or that every administration action came from Project 2025. Those are separate claims and need separate evidence.