Project 2025
Question: What did the project itself say it was building across policy, personnel, training and implementation?
Boundary: A blueprint does not by itself prove that every later administration action came from it.
Open file →Case files
One question at a time.
The map shows breadth. Case files show depth: a narrowly framed question, the strongest available records, a chronology, visible evidence labels, direct receipts and an explicit list of what the evidence does not establish.
Reading rule
A case file is not an accusation.
Documented
Direct record
The cited source directly supports the narrow claim in the file.
Supported interpretation
Reasoned conclusion
Multiple documented facts support the interpretation, but the conclusion remains interpretive.
Open question
Evidence gap
The answer is not established, so the file says so instead of filling the gap.
Disputed
Conflict remains
Material evidence or credible accounts conflict and the disagreement is preserved.
Flagship investigation
Start with a case where the mechanism is documented in the organization’s own words.
Expanded flagship · documented core
CPI & Patriots’ Row
The expanded file follows CPI from its 2017 founding through staffing, training, incubation, coalition-building, Patriots’ Row, the Conservative Partnership Academy and the organizations CPI says it helped launch.
It then separates that documented infrastructure from the stronger claims the evidence does not support: command, illegal coordination, donor control or automatic control over officials who later return to government.
Core question
How does outside infrastructure become governing capacity?
This file makes staffing, training, incubation, coalition-building and personnel movement visible without turning an ecosystem into a conspiracy claim.
Other case files
The same standard, applied to narrower questions.
Election-data network
Question: What is documented about EIN, Heather Honey and federal voter-data flows, and where does the source chain remain unresolved?
Boundary: No vendor or original source is named unless the public record identifies it.
Open file →What every file should answer
Claim. Receipt. Limit.
Every case file should make it easy to see what the record establishes, what interpretation follows from those facts, what remains unknown, and what the page is explicitly not claiming.
Challenge the work
Corrections are part of the method.
If a source is wrong, stale, incomplete or better evidence changes the conclusion, the page should change with it.